By admin 
Each trait represents a continuum. Individuals can fall wherever on the continuum for each trait.
Not like totally different trait theories that sort individuals into binary lessons (i.e. introvert or extrovert), the Huge 5 Model asserts that each character trait is a spectrum.
Because of this reality, individuals are ranked on a scale between the two extreme ends of 5 broad dimensions:
For instance, when measuring Extraversion, one would not be categorised as purely extroverted or introverted, nevertheless positioned on a scale determining their diploma of extraversion.
By score individuals on each of these traits, it is attainable to efficiently measure specific particular person variations in character.
The Huge 5 character traits are normally measured using standardized questionnaires or inventories, the place individuals cost themselves on diverse statements or adjectives.These assessments, such as a result of the NEO Character Inventory (NEO-PI) or the Huge 5 Inventory (BFI), current scores for each of the 5 traits, allowing for a whole character profile.
Conscientiousness
Conscientiousness describes a person’s capability to regulate impulse administration to work together in goal-directed behaviors (Grohol, 2019). It measures components akin to administration, inhibition, and persistence of conduct.
Sides of conscientiousness (John & Srivastava, 1999):
| Extraordinarily conscientious people are sometimes: | Low conscientious people are sometimes: |
| Competent | Incompotent |
| Organized | Disorganized |
| Dutiful | Careless |
| Achievement-striving | Procrastinators |
| Self-disciplined | Undisciplined |
| Considerate | Impulsive |
Conscientiousness vs. Lack of Course
Those who score extreme on conscientiousness can be described as organized, disciplined, detail-oriented, thoughtful, and cautious. Moreover they’ve good impulse administration, which lets them end duties and acquire targets.
Those who score low on conscientiousness would possibly wrestle with impulse administration, leading to difficulty in ending duties and fulfilling targets.
They’re normally further disorganized and can dislike an extreme quantity of building. They could moreover work together in further impulsive and careless conduct.
Precise-life impression of conscientiousness
- Conscientiousness is the strongest predictor of all 5 traits for job effectivity (John & Srivastava, 1999).
- People who score extreme in conscientiousness have been observed to have increased effectively being outcomes and longevity (John & Srivastava, 1999). This could be attributable to having well-structured lives along with the impulse administration to look at diets, therapies, and lots of others.
- A extreme score on conscientiousness predicts increased highschool and school grades (Myers, 2011).
- Low conscientiousness predicts juvenile delinquency (John & Srivastava, 1999).
Reflective questions
Consider the following inquiries to see how conscientious you are:1. How very important is it in an effort to maintain your commitments and meet deadlines?
2. Do you prefer to plan ahead or act spontaneously?
3. How organized do you keep your residing and dealing areas?
4. How merely are you ready to withstand temptations or distractions when specializing in a exercise?
Agreeableness
Agreeableness refers to how people are prone to cope with relationships with others. Not like extraversion which consists of the pursuit of relationships, agreeableness focuses on people’s orientation and interactions with others (Ackerman, 2017).
Sides of agreeableness (John & Srivastava, 1999):
| Extraordinarily agreeable people are sometimes: | Low agreeable people are sometimes: |
| Trustful (forgiving) | Skeptical |
| Easy | Demanding |
| Altruistic (benefit from serving to) | Insulting (and belittling others) |
| Compliant | Stubborn |
| Modest | Current-offs |
| Sympathetic | Unsympathetic |
| Empathetic | A lot much less caring |
Agreeableness vs. Antagonism
These extreme in agreeableness can be described as soft-hearted, trusting, and well-liked. They’re delicate to the desires of others and are helpful and cooperative. People regard them as dependable and altruistic.
These low in agreeableness may be perceived as suspicious, manipulative, and uncooperative. They could be antagonistic when interacting with others, making them a lot much less susceptible to be well-liked and trusted.
Precise-life impression of agreeableness
- In marriages the place one companion scores lower than the other on agreeableness there could also be susceptible to be marital dissatisfaction (Myers, 2011).
- Low agreeableness has been linked to elevated chances of effectively being points (John & Srivastava, 1999).
- Low agreeableness predicts juvenile delinquency (John & Srivastava, 1999).
- Agreeableness predicts increased effectivity in jobs the place teamwork is worried. Nonetheless, it is negatively related to specific particular person proactivity (Neal et al., 2012).
Reflective questions
Consider the following inquiries to see how agreeable you are:1. How merely do you perception others and gives them the benefit of the doubt?
2. How very important is it in an effort to stay away from conflicts and protect harmony?
3. Do you uncover it easy to empathize with others' emotions and views?
4. How normally do you place others' desires sooner than your private?
Extraversion
Extraversion shows the tendency and depth to which anyone seeks interaction with their setting, notably socially. It encompasses the comfort and assertiveness ranges of people in social circumstances.
Furthermore, it moreover shows the sources from which anyone attracts vitality.
Sides of extraversion (John & Srivastava, 1999):
| Extraordinarily extraverted people are sometimes: | Low extraverted people are sometimes: |
| Sociable | Joyful in solitude |
| Energized by social interaction | Fatigued by an extreme quantity of social interaction |
| Pleasure-seeking | Reflective |
| Joyful to be the main focus | Uncomfortable being focus |
| Outgoing | Reserved |
Extraversion vs. Introversion
These extreme on extraversion are normally assertive, sociable, fun-loving, and outgoing. They thrive in social circumstances and actually really feel comfortable voicing their opinions. They generally tend to comprehend vitality and become excited from being spherical others.
Those who score low in extraversion are typically referred to as introverts. These people are normally further reserved and quieter. They like listening to others considerably than needing to be heard.
Introverts normally need durations of solitude with a goal to regain vitality as attending social events can be very tiring for them.
Of significance to note is that introverts do not primarily dislike social events, nevertheless in its place uncover them tiring.
Precise-life impression of extraversion
- Extraversion is a predictor of administration, along with success in product sales and administration positions (John & Srivastava, 1999).
- Those who score extreme on extraversion are a lot much less susceptible to experience loneliness (Buecker et al., 2020).
- People who work along with extroverts persistently select them to be worse at listening as compared with these low in extraversion (Flynn et al., 2023).
Reflective questions
Consider the following inquiries to see how extroverted you are:1. Do you feel energized or drained after spending time in big social gatherings?
2.How comfortable are you with being the main focus?
3. Do you prefer working in teams or independently?
4. How normally do you provoke conversations with strangers?
Openness to Experience
Openness to experience refers to 1’s willingness to try new points along with work together in imaginative and psychological actions. It accommodates the pliability to “suppose exterior of the sphere.”
Sides of openness (John & Srivastava, 1999):
| Extreme openness people are sometimes: | Low openness people are sometimes: |
| Curious | Predictable |
| Imaginative | Not very imaginative |
| Ingenious | Uncomfortable with change |
| Open to trying new points | Strict with routine |
| Unconventional | Standard |
Openness vs. Closedness to Experience
Those who score extreme on openness to experience are perceived as ingenious and artistic. They like choice and price independence. They’re interested by their setting and luxuriate in touring and learning new points.
People who score low on openness to experience select routine. They’re uncomfortable with change and trying new points, in order that they just like the acquainted over the unknown.
As they’re smart people, they normally uncover it troublesome to suppose creatively or abstractly.
Precise-life impression of openness
- In marriages the place one companion scores lower than the other on openness, there could also be susceptible to be marital dissatisfaction (Myers, 2011).
- Openness to experience is positively related to specific particular person proactivity nevertheless negatively related to group effectivity inside the workplace (Neal et al., 2012).
- People who score extreme in openness to experience are a lot much less susceptible to actually really feel lonely (Buecker et al., 2020).
Reflective questions
Consider the following inquiries to see how open to experiences you are:1. Do you benefit from trying new actions or select sticking to acquainted routines?
2. How normally do you find yourself daydreaming or exploring abstract ideas?
3. Are you drawn to art work, music, or totally different ingenious pursuits?
4. How comfortable are you with change and uncertainty in your life?
Neuroticism
Neuroticism describes the overall emotional stability of an individual by way of how they perceive the world. It takes into consideration how seemingly a person is to interpret events as threatening or troublesome.
It moreover accommodates one’s propensity to experience unfavourable emotions.
Sides of neuroticism (John & Srivastava, 1999):
| Extraordinarily neurotic people are sometimes: | Low neurotic people are sometimes: |
| Anxious | Laid once more |
| Hostile (irritable) | Calm |
| Very careworn | Emotionally regular |
| Self-conscious (shy) | Assured |
| Weak | Resillient |
| Experiencing dramatic shifts in mood | Not typically sad or depressed |
Neuroticism vs. Emotional Stability
Those who score extreme on neuroticism normally actually really feel anxious, insecure, and self-pitying. They’re normally perceived as moody and irritable. They’re liable to excessive unhappiness and low vainness.
Those who score low on neuroticism normally are typically calm, protected, and self-satisfied. They are much much less susceptible to be perceived as anxious or moody. They’re further susceptible to have extreme vainness and keep resilient.
Precise-life impression of neuroticism
- In marriages the place one companion scores lower than the other on emotional stability there could also be susceptible to be marital dissatisfaction (Myers, 2011).
- Neuroticism seems to be a menace difficulty for lots of effectively being points, along with despair (and totally different mood points), schizophrenia, diabetes, bronchial bronchial asthma, irritable bowel syndrome, and coronary coronary heart sickness (Lahey, 2009).
- Neuroticism predicts increased effectivity in jobs the place teamwork is worried (Neal et al., 2012).
- Those who score extreme on neuroticism normally are inclined to experience loneliness (Buecker et al., 2020).
Reflective questions
Consider the following inquiries to see how emotionally regular you are:1. How normally do you're involved about points which can go unsuitable?
2. How merely do you bounce once more from setbacks or disappointments?
3. Do you're prone to dwell on unfavourable experiences or permit them to go quickly?
4. How assured do you feel in your capability to cope with life's challenges?
New evaluation on media and know-how
Manolika (2023) investigated how Huge 5 character traits relate to preferences for numerous movie and e-book genres amongst school school college students. Key findings embrace:
- Openness to experience predicted preferences for sophisticated movement photos (e.g., documentaries) and unconventional books (e.g., philosophy).
- Conscientiousness was associated to a need for informational books.
- Agreeableness predicted liking for typical genres akin to family movement photos and romance books.
- Neuroticism solely correlated with a need for delicate books, not movement photos.
- Extraversion did not significantly predict media preferences, reverse to preliminary hypotheses.
These outcomes counsel that character traits have an effect on media choices, with individuals selecting leisure that aligns with their psychological desires and character factors.
Roehrick et al. (2023) examined how Huge 5 traits relate to smartphone use amongst college school college students. Key findings embrace:
- Extraverts used their telephones further constantly as quickly as checked.
- Conscientious people have been a lot much less seemingly to utilize their telephones and used them for shorter durations.
- Smartphones have been used further in public, with weaker social ties, and thru class/work actions.
- Extraversion and conscientiousness have been primarily essentially the most associated traits for predicting smartphone use patterns.
- Contextual components (location, social ties, actions) significantly influenced smartphone use size.
These outcomes counsel that every character traits and contextual components significantly have an effect on smartphone use patterns.
Whereas traits like extraversion and conscientiousness predict positive factors of digital conduct, situational components akin to location, social setting, and ongoing actions play an essential place in determining the size and frequency of smartphone use.
Vital Evaluation
Descriptor Moderately Than a Idea
The Huge 5 was developed to rearrange character traits considerably than as a whole precept of character.
Because of this reality, it is further descriptive than explanatory and does not completely account for variations between individuals (John & Srivastava, 1999). It moreover does not sufficiently current a causal motive for human conduct.
Cross-Cultural Validity
Although the Huge 5 has been examined in a lot of worldwide areas and its existence is generally supported by findings (McCrae, 2002), there have been some analysis that do not help its model.
Most earlier analysis have examined the presence of the Huge 5 in urbanized, literate populations.
A study by Gurven et al. (2013) was the first to examine the validity of the Huge 5 model in a largely illiterate, indigenous inhabitants in Bolivia. They administered a 44-item Huge 5 Inventory nevertheless found that the members did not sort the devices in consistency with the Huge 5 traits.
Additional evaluation on illiterate and non-industrialized populations is required to clarify such discrepancies.
Gender Variations
Variations inside the Huge 5 character traits between genders have been observed, nevertheless these variations are small as compared with variations between individuals inside the same gender.
Costa et al. (2001) gathered information from over 23,000 men and women in 26 worldwide areas. They found that “gender variations are modest in magnitude, in step with gender stereotypes, and replicable all through cultures” (p. 328).
Women reported themselves to be elevated in Neuroticism, Agreeableness, Warmth (a facet of Extraversion), and Openness to Feelings as compared with males. Males reported themselves to be elevated in Assertiveness (a facet of Extraversion) and Openness to Ideas.
One different attention-grabbing discovering was that bigger gender variations have been reported in Western, industrialized worldwide areas.
Researchers proposed that primarily essentially the most plausible motive for this discovering was attribution processes.
They surmised that the actions of women in individualistic worldwide areas might be further susceptible to be attributed to their character, whereas actions of women in collectivistic worldwide areas might be further susceptible to be attributed to their compliance with gender place norms.
Parts that Have an effect on the Huge 5
Like with all theories of character, the Huge 5 is influenced by every nature and nurture. Twin analysis have found that the heritability (the amount of variance that could be attributed to genes) of the Huge 5 traits is 40-60%.
Jang et al. (1996) carried out a study with 123 pairs of comparable twins and 127 pairs of fraternal twins.
They estimated the heritability of conscientiousness, agreeableness, neuroticism, openness to experience, and extraversion to be 44%, 41%, 41%, 61%, and 53%, respectively.
This discovering was very similar to the findings of 1 different study, the place the heritability of conscientiousness, agreeableness, neuroticism, openness to experience and extraversion have been estimated to be 49%, 48%, 49%, 48%, and 50%, respectively (Jang et al., 1998).
Such twin analysis reveal that the Huge 5 character traits are significantly influenced by genes and that all 5 traits are equally heritable.
Heritability for men and women does not seem to fluctuate significantly (Leohlin et al., 1998).
Analysis from completely totally different worldwide areas moreover help the considered a strong genetic basis for the Huge 5 character traits (Riemann et al., 1997; Yamagata et al., 2006).
The Roehrick et al. (2023) study on smartphone use revealed that whereas character traits like extraversion and conscientiousness have an effect on know-how use, context performs an essential place.
Most variability in smartphone use was within-person, suggesting that situational components normally outweigh character in determining conduct.
This discovering underscores the importance of considering every specific particular person traits and environmental components when studying character influences on conduct.
Stability of the Traits
People’s scores of the Huge 5 keep comparatively regular for a lot of of their life with some slight modifications from childhood to maturity.
A study by Soto & John (2012) tried to hint the developmental tendencies of the Huge 5 traits.
They found that basic agreeableness and conscientiousness elevated with age. There was no very important sample for extraversion basic although gregariousness decreased and assertiveness elevated.
Openness to experience and neuroticism decreased barely from adolescence to middle maturity.
The researchers concluded that there have been further very important tendencies particularly features (i.e. adventurousness and despair) considerably than inside the Huge 5 traits basic.
Historic previous and Background
The Huge 5 model resulted from the contributions of many unbiased researchers. Gordon Allport and Henry Odbert first usual a list of 4,500 phrases concerning character traits in 1936 (Vinney, 2018).
Their work provided the inspiration for various psychologists to start out determining the important dimensions of character.
Throughout the Nineteen Forties, Raymond Cattell and his colleagues used difficulty analysis (a statistical methodology) to slender down Allport’s file to sixteen traits.
Nonetheless, fairly a number of psychologists examined Cattell’s file and situated that it could be further lowered to five traits.
Amongst these psychologists have been Donald Fiske, Norman, Smith, Goldberg, and McCrae & Costa (Cherry, 2019).
Significantly, Lewis Goldberg advocated intently for five principal components of character (Ackerman, 2017).
His work was expanded upon by McCrae & Costa, who confirmed the model’s validity and provided the model used as we communicate: conscientiousness, agreeableness, neuroticism, openness to experience, and extraversion.
The model turned typically referred to as the “Huge 5” and has seen acquired lots consideration. It has been researched all through many populations and cultures and continues to be primarily essentially the most broadly accepted precept of character as we communicate.
Each of the Huge 5 character traits represents terribly broad lessons which cowl many personality-related phrases. Each trait encompasses a lot of totally different features.
As an illustration, the trait of Extraversion is a category that includes labels akin to Gregariousness (sociable), Assertiveness (forceful), Train (energetic), Pleasure-seeking (adventurous), Optimistic emotions (enthusiastic), and Warmth (outgoing) (John & Srivastava, 1999).
Because of this reality, the Huge 5, whereas not completely exhaustive, cowl practically all personality-related phrases.
One different very important facet of the Huge 5 Model is its methodology to measuring character. It focuses on conceptualizing traits as a spectrum considerably than black-and-white lessons.
It acknowledges that the majority individuals normally are usually not on the polar ends of the spectrum nevertheless considerably someplace in between.
Steadily Requested Questions
Is 5 Truly the Magic Amount?
A typical criticism of the Huge 5 is that each trait is just too broad. Although the Huge 5 is helpful by means of providing a troublesome overview of character, further specific traits are required to be of use for predicting outcomes (John & Srivastava, 1999).
There could also be moreover an argument from psychologists that better than 5 traits are required to embody the whole thing of character.
A model new model, HEXACO, was developed by Kibeom Lee and Michael Ashton, and expands upon the Huge 5 Model.
HEXACO retains the distinctive traits from the Huge 5 Model nevertheless incorporates one further trait: Honesty-Humility, which they describe as a result of the extent to which one areas others’ pursuits above their very personal.
What are the variations between the Huge 5 and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator?
The Huge 5 character traits and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) are every in type fashions used to know character. Nonetheless, they differ in numerous strategies.
The Huge 5 traits signify 5 broad dimensions of character. Each trait is measured alongside a continuum, and other people can fall wherever alongside that spectrum.
In distinction, the MBTI categorizes individuals into one among 16 character varieties primarily based totally on their preferences for 4 dichotomies: extraversion/introversion, sensing/intuition, contemplating/feeling, and judging/perceiving.
This model assumes that people are each one kind or one different considerably than being on a continuum.
Common, whereas every fashions goal to elucidate and categorize character, the Huge 5 is believed to have further empirical evaluation and further scientific help, whereas the MBTI is further of a precept and often lacks strong empirical proof.
Is it attainable to boost positive Huge 5 traits by way of treatment or totally different interventions?
It might be attainable to boost positive Huge 5 traits by way of treatment or totally different interventions.
As an illustration, individuals who score low in conscientiousness would possibly revenue from treatment that focuses on rising planning, organizational, and time-management skills.
These with extreme neuroticism would possibly revenue from cognitive-behavioral treatment, which helps individuals deal with unfavourable concepts and emotions.
Furthermore, treatment akin to mindfulness-based interventions would possibly enhance scores in traits akin to openness and agreeableness.
Nonetheless, the extent to which these interventions can change character traits long-term continues to be a topic of debate amongst psychologists.
Is it attainable to have a extreme score in a number of Huge 5 trait?
Positive, it is attainable to have a extreme score in a number of Huge 5 trait. Each trait is unbiased of the others, that signifies that an individual can score extreme on openness, extraversion, and conscientiousness, as an example, all on the same time.
Equally, an individual could score low on one trait and extreme on one different. The Huge 5 traits are measured alongside a continuum, so individuals can fall wherever alongside that spectrum for each trait.
Because of this reality, it’s not unusual for individuals to have a singular combination of extreme and low scores all through the Huge 5 character traits.
References
Ackerman, C. (2017, June 23). Huge 5 Character Traits: The OCEAN Model Outlined. PositivePsychology.com. https://positivepsychology.com/big-five-personality-theory
Buecker, S., Maes, M., Denissen, J. J., & Luhmann, M. (2020). Loneliness and the Huge 5 character traits: A meta–analysis. European Journal of Character, 34(1), 8-28. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2229
Cherry, Okay. (2019, October 14). What Are the Huge 5 Character Traits? Verywell Ideas. Retrieved 12 June 2020, from https://www.verywellmind.com/the-big-five-personality-dimensions-2795422
Costa, P., Terracciano, A., & McCrae, R. (2001). Gender Variations in Character Traits All through Cultures: Sturdy and Surprising Findings. Journal of Character and Social Psychology, 81 (2), 322-331. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.322
Fiske, D. W. (1949). Consistency of the factorial constructions of character rankings from completely totally different sources. The Journal of Irregular and Social Psychology, 44 (3), 329-344. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057198
Flynn, F. J., Collins, H., & Zlatev, J. (2023). Are you listening to me? The unfavourable hyperlink between extraversion and perceived listening. Character and Social Psychology Bulletin, 49(6), 837-851. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211072815
Grohol, J. M. (2019, Might 30). The Huge 5 Character Traits. PsychCentral. Retrieved 10 June 2020, from https://psychcentral.com/lib/the-big-five-personality-traits
Gurven, M., von Rueden, C., Massenkoff, M., Kaplan, H., & Lero Vie, M. (2013). How widespread is the Huge 5? Testing the five-factor model of character variation amongst forager-farmers inside the Bolivian Amazon. Journal of character and social psychology, 104 (2), 354–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030841
Jang, Okay. L., Livesley, W. J., & Vemon, P. A. (1996). Heritability of the Huge 5 Character Dimensions and Their Sides: A Twin Analysis. Journal of Character, 64 (3), 577–592. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1996.tb00522.x
Jang, Okay. L., McCrae, R. R., Angleitner, A., Riemann, R., & Livesley, W. J. (1998). Heritability of facet-level traits in a cross-cultural twin sample: Assist for a hierarchical model of character. Journal of Character and Social Psychology, 74 (6), 1556–1565.
John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Huge-5 trait taxonomy: Historic previous, measurement, and theoretical views. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of character: Idea and evaluation (Vol. 2, pp. 102–138). New York: Guilford Press.
Lahey B. B. (2009). Public effectively being significance of neuroticism. The American psychologist, 64 (4), 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015309
Loehlin, J. C., McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., & John, O. P. (1998). Heritabilities of Widespread and Measure-Specific Parts of the Huge 5 Character Parts. Journal of Evaluation in Character, 32 (4), 431–453. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1998.2225
Manolika, M. (2023). The Huge 5 and previous: Which character traits do predict movie and learning preferences? Psychology of Customary Media, 12(2), 197–206
McCrae, R. R. (2002). Cross-Cultural Evaluation on the 5-Difficulty Model of Character. On-line Readings in Psychology and Custom, 4 (4). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1038
Myers, David G. (2011). Psychology (tenth ed.). Worth Publishers.
Neal, A., Yeo, G., Koy, A., & Xiao, T. (2012). Predicting the form and path of labor place effectivity from the Huge 5 model of character traits. Journal of Organizational Conduct, 33 (2), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.742
Riemann, R., Angleitner, A., & Strelau, J. (1997). Genetic and Environmental Influences on Character: A Analysis of Twins Reared Collectively Using the Self‐ and Peer Report NEO‐FFI Scales. Journal of Character, 65 (3), 449-475.
Roehrick, Okay. C., Vaid, S. S., & Harari, G. M. (2023). Situating smartphones in day-to-day life: Huge 5 traits and contexts associated to youthful adults’ smartphone use. Journal of Character and Social Psychology, 125(5), 1096–1118.
Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2012). Development of Huge 5 Domains and Sides in Maturity: Suggest-Diploma Age Tendencies and Broadly Versus Narrowly Performing Mechanism. Journal of Character, 80 (4), 881–914. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00752.x
Vinney, C. (2018, September 27). Understanding the Huge 5 Character Traits. ThoughtCo. Retrieved 12 June 2020, from https://www.thoughtco.com/big-five-personality-traits-4176097
Yamagata, S., Suzuki, A., Ando, J., Ono, Y., Kijima, N., Yoshimura, Okay., . . . Jang, Okay. (2006). Is the Genetic Building of Human Character Widespread? A Cross-Cultural Twin Analysis From North America, Europe, and Asia. Journal of Character and Social Psychology, 90 (6), 987-998. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.6.987
Maintain Learning
- Minnesota Multiphasic Character Inventory (MMPI)
- McCrae, R. R., & Terracciano, A. (2005). Widespread choices of character traits from the observer’s perspective: information from 50 cultures. Journal of Character and Social Psychology, 88 (3), 547.
- Cobb-Clark, DA & Schurer, S. The stability of big-five character traits. Economics Letters. 2012; 115 (2): 11–15.
- Marsh, H. W., Nagengast, B., & Morin, A. J. (2013). Measurement invariance of big-five components over the life span: ESEM exams of gender, age, plasticity, maturity, and la dolce vita outcomes. Developmental psychology, 49 (6), 1194.
- Vitality RA, Pluess M. Heritability estimates of the Huge 5 character traits primarily based totally on widespread genetic variants. Transl Psychiatry. 2015;5 :e604.
- Character Theories Book Chapter
- The Cambridge Handbook of Character Psychology
